| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
slyfox mentioned that autoconf gets confused and downgrades to -std=gnu++11
from -std=gnu++17 (which autoconf defaults to) because the test is built
using -std=gnu++20 (new default) and it's invalid there.
Digging into that, it looks like it got fixed already a little while ago
by Paul, so just backport the patch.
Reported-by: Sergei Trofimovich <slyich@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
I think at this point..
1) sys-devel/gettext is ready in terms of any changes needed to that package;
2) autotools.eclass's eautoreconf needs updating to match the autoreconf patches
from Bruno which we're applying here;
3) autotools.eclass should seriously consider using autoreconf instead, not
reinventing it
Also, stable for remaining arches to make it easier to update the patch
in-place.
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/957583
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/962269
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
See https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gettext/2025-07/msg00006.html.
Bruno Haible pointed out (thank you!) that we need these in addition to
the changes I mentioned in ed7c4d9dd8c684444b529370944d1991bb50cb7e.
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/957583
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
The macro itself is broken in autoconf-2.13 but this is caused by newer kernels
etc rather than anything else. Very, very few packages use autoconf-2.13, let
alone AC_FUNC_GETLOADAVG, so not going to worry about it much.
Do as Fedora and Debian do and skip the test for it.
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/406723
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/677926
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
|
