| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
|
Also sync small style/comment changes with PyQt6's ebuild, meant
to do this on a bump like PyQt6 but this is still the latest.
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
|
Turns out that this *can* use clang++ but only if qtbase was built with
clang++ as well, otherwise it still uses g++ even with CXX=clang++
But given the former, there is little reason to enforce the dependency.
Ideally would use CXX but that would require more elaborate testing to
know what it is and what qtbase was built with (perhaps if ever add the
hack to qmake-utils.eclass).
No revbump given PyQt* bindings are a slowish build and depcleaning
gcc is a bit niche, the few interested can handle this manually until
next bump.
Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/31493
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
|
Seems to rarely be an issue but hit symbol problems when using
PyQt6-6.4.2 with Qt6.5 without a rebuild (otherwise works with
6.5 just fine).
Could happen with 6.6+ too, albeit mitigated by PyQt6 bumps happening
around same time and forcing the rebuild either way.
Going to skip revbump for now given the above and being a slow build
(plus it's masked), uncertain whether it'll even be needed for 6.6.
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
|
Didn't really make a difference before, but now it does,
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
