summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/dev-python
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAlexei Colin <acolin@isi.edu>2021-01-22 00:01:50 -0500
committerGuilherme Amadio <amadio@gentoo.org>2021-06-07 17:22:22 +0200
commit07433fc7688d7b49c29440b995719210bb441d22 (patch)
tree13de213c081eb696dc54701159b55c73bbbd2adc /dev-python
parent1c2210c49a427dd15d93fd3635557ec9e1dbff1e (diff)
downloadgentoo-07433fc7688d7b49c29440b995719210bb441d22.tar.gz
gentoo-07433fc7688d7b49c29440b995719210bb441d22.tar.bz2
gentoo-07433fc7688d7b49c29440b995719210bb441d22.zip
profiles: prefixify dynamic linker for ppc64
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/755551 The issue: prefix stage3 fails because the binaries built by the stage3 GCC toolchain fail to run, because they refer to the host's dynamic linker: $ which gawk /myprefix/usr/bin/gawk $ gawk --version gawk: /lib64/libm.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.29' not found (required by gawk) $ readelf -l $(which gawk) | grep -i 'program [Requesting program interpreter: /lib64/ld64.so.2] The cause is that the toolchain doesn't insert a prefixified path into the binary because the default -dynamic-linker is not prefixified: $ which powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc /myprefix/usr/bin/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc $ echo 'int main() { return 0; }' > test.c $ powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -v -o test test.c COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-v' '-o' 'testx' /myprefix/usr/libexec/gcc/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/10.2.0/collect2 --eh-frame-hdr -V -m elf64lppc -dynamic-linker /libb64/ld64.so.2 ... The root cause: Prefixifying is done by patching the GCC source code with a sed expression in profile.bashrc. The pattern in that sed expression doesn't match the source file for ppc64 (aka. rs6000). The ppc64 file differs from the rest in that it has a macro for the prefix. Notes on fix: I opted to special-case another sed expression to set that unique DYNAMIC_LINKER_PREFIX macro rather than attempt to make a single sed expression that would modify the *_DYNAMIC_LINKER macros in ppc64. Rationale is that if someone happens to look at the patched source file, it would make more sense if the DYNAMIC_LINKER_PREFIX is set to our prefix, instead of if that macro is set to empty but the *_DYNAMIC_LINKER macros have effectively two prefixes, one hardcoded added by sed, one from the DYNAMIC_LINKER_PREFIX macro. Signed-off-by: Alexei Colin <ac@alexeicolin.com> Signed-off-by: Guilherme Amadio <amadio@gentoo.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'dev-python')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions