| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
builds
A recent adjustment to some of the vim-core ebuilds accidentally removed a sed
command that removes the following line from /etc/vim/vimrc, provided that the
"minimal" USE flag was in effect.
let g:skip_defaults_vim = 1
The reason for doing so is that this assignment raises an error in the case of
a minimal build. Rather than re-instate the missing sed commands, let's update
the vimrc template so as to employ a feature guard, relying on the fact that
minimal builds lack the +eval feature.
Fixes: 5e9a3926fd3e0e573f529fd6aefebba53e082f4a
Signed-off-by: Kerin Millar <kfm@plushkava.net>
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
bash-5.2 is stricter with this and upstream say this was never
supposed to work (and indeed may have done odd things at runtime
anyway).
We're going to have to avoid any conditional use of extglob
like this as the parser has no idea if we've enabled extglob
or not at the point it runs.
Fixes a sourcing error:
```
vim-core-9999.ebuild: line 195: syntax error near unexpected token `('
vim-core-9999.ebuild: line 195: ` ignore=$(rm -fr "${ED}${vimfiles}"/colors/!(${keep_colors}).vim )'
```
Thanks-to: tirnanog (mangled his suggestion in this commit)
Thanks-to: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org>
|
|
The configure script checks for ncurses, specifically libtinfo:
checking for tgetent in -ltinfo... yes
Depending on ncurses helps when cross-compiling vim-core, as ncurses may
not be built for the host yet.
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/854909
Signed-off-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org>
|
