| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Done via:
```
git grep -l virtual/zlib$ | xargs sed -i -e 's@virtual/zlib$@&:=@'
```
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
|
|
Update done using:
```
git grep -l sys-libs/zlib dev-* | xargs sed -i -e s@sys-libs/zlib@virtual/zlib@g
git diff --name-only | xargs copybump
git diff --name-only | xargs grep -l PYTHON_COMPAT | xargs gpy-impl -@dead
pkgcheck scan --commits -c SourcingCheck,VisibilityCheck --exit error
```
Followed by manual revert in dev-python/zlib-ng where it accidentally
caught sys-libs/zlib-ng dependencies.
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
|
|
Reported by phaebz.
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
Result of running the command:
grep --include="*.ebuild" -r . -e 'KEYWORDS=.*[" ]sparc' -l | xargs ekeyword ~sparc
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
|
|
Result of running the command:
grep --include="*.ebuild" -r . -e 'KEYWORDS=.*[" ]hppa' -l | xargs ekeyword ~hppa
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
|
|
It's prebuilt so can't be rebuilt against new subslots, of course.
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
Passes gcc:14 bootstrap albeit plain `emerge` of sys-devel/gcc:14
with USE=ada failed with circular dep (not trying to satisfy the
BDEPEND with dev-lang/ada-bootstrap at all before bailing). Direct
`ebuild` invocation worked.
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/946645
Signed-off-by: WANG Xuerui <xen0n@gentoo.org>
|
|
Same as 8e2955e0eb4d9e00f39f41e4801893429c0ba6e7 but tree state at:
```
Timestamp of repository gentoo: Wed, 01 Jan 2025 19:18:22 +0000
Head commit of repository gentoo: 7221b3f8c7af080380122dadb60808c0a00d1b07
```
but I haven't done a world upgrade or anything like that from the stage3
as it was.
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/946650
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
Same environment as described in 8e2955e0eb4d9e00f39f41e4801893429c0ba6e7.
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/946647
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
Native bootstrap of sys-devel/gcc-14.2.1_p20241221 succeeded.
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/946647
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
This is still using the stage3 from before (stage3-amd64-hardened-systemd-20241214T201851Z)
although with tree state this time at:
```
Timestamp of repository gentoo: Tue, 31 Dec 2024 14:03:40 +0000
Head commit of repository gentoo: db8e97771bd345dc8a801b7a056f86b4ddb43953
```
I didn't use `crossdev -S` and sed out ~hppa in make.conf this time accidentally
because of a script change I forgot to make, but I don't think it matters
as latest glibc + gcc are already stable fortunately.
Interestingly, when I tried this last (HPPA was the first arch I tried
when manually doing the ada-bootstrap work for non-amd64), it failed
w/ gen_il-main in finalization, but this time, it seems to have at least
got further...
There were some HPPA fixes Dave committed on the 14 branch
between 14.2.1_p20241116 (previous attempt) and 14.2.1_p20241221 (this one),
so that must be it, or it's that I'd made some error before as the eclass
changes and script didn't exist at that point and I was trying stuff adhoc.
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/946647
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
For HPPA, the version is going to be newer and it's easier to do this
than hardcode another value.
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/946647
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/946644
Signed-off-by: Jakov Smolić <jsmolic@gentoo.org>
|
|
Same details as cae8f6ff8f9a857ba3a07371d6b2d5d8996afb5f although I built
it at the same time as amd64 (see a73baf031bc6e4b613ae181491fedfa3e8437232).
This one was a bit delayed as wasn't included in the first batch because
they're pure ~arch (TODO: find a way to handle that more nicely in the
script to use stable for stable arches, and not otherwise; could grep
arches.desc?)
We have alpha, hppa, mips, m68k, and x86 left. m68k wasn't done yet
because its current GCC is 13 still b/c of a bootstrap failure.
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/940472
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/940472
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
Same details as in cae8f6ff8f9a857ba3a07371d6b2d5d8996afb5f for how it
was built, but with tree state on 17th November 2024 and not built w/
crossdev.
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/940472
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/940472
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/940472
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/940472
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
Otherwise, we might have ${A} containing more than one and then we unpack
the last one listed (which isn't necessarily right at all) and also fail
w/ wrong number of args to dosym.
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/940472
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
This adds bootstrap tarballs for GNAT for the following platforms:
* aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
* armv6j-softfp-linux-gnueabi
* armv6j-unknown-linux-gnueabihf
* armv7a-softfp-linux-gnueabi
* armv7a-unknown-linux-gnueabihf
* powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu
* powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu
* powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu
* sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu
More are planned (like HPPA, but I had an issue there when using the
built tarball; I don't think the tarball was to blame, rather some
deeper issue needing investigation) but this feels like a decent set
to start with.
We should also of course build a fresh one for amd64 and also x86.
They were built using a script [0] using stage3-amd64-hardened-systemd-20241214T201851Z.tar.xz
with ::gentoo state around 16th November 2024 (I say "around" as I synced
in-between to get an eclass fix).
NOTE: I've only added ~arm64 for now as I've tested the binary there
to bootstrap GNAT natively. I'll add other keywords once tested.
[0] https://github.com/thesamesam/sam-gentoo-scripts/blob/91558fb51c56a661d6f374507888ff67725ca660/build-ada-bootstraps
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/940472
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
