| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
|
Thought hit a 6.6.1 regression while using 6.6.9999 after had rebuilt
the qt stack without tests, but turns out qtbase[test] vs [-test] seems
to affect this test.
Given most people running tests with qtwebengine likely enable for the
rest of the qt stack, seems went overlooked.
Failure itself is trivial, it is likely the test being performed badly
(fake touch and hold text selection event) rather than an actual
runtime problem. Let's just skip for now to avoid issues when attempt
to keyword this by itself.
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
|
Just so use of the word does not get outdated.
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
|
For convenience, use LIBXML_VERSION rather than has_version
so that can include in patchset tarball later if still needed.
Formerly meant to fix only in upcoming 6.6.1 (soon) but is a
simple and safe fix so let's fix the others too.
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/917601
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
|
Just a quick fix, not fixed in either upstreams yet.
Have not tried qt5.
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org>
|
